Might I suggest, accepting that those who allege to provide fake freedom (without responsibility or consequences) is the new "god" that you start opposing by reconciling the fake "differences" between the religious and secular:?
Its easy: God's existence: unproveble. Gods will (natural law): irrefutable.:
"wholescale rejection of the natural law"
Might I suggest, accepting that those who allege to provide fake freedom (without responsibility or consequences) is the new "god" that you start opposing by reconciling the fake "differences" between the religious and secular:?
Its easy: God's existence: unproveble. Gods will (natural law): irrefutable.:
https://www.nazisociopaths.org/modules/article/view.article.php/36
The natural law has no authority on its own. God’s existence and general nature is demonstrable. His inner nature and salvific will for man is not.
A profoundly sublime post. Thank you
You’re welcome, and thanks for your compliment.